antisocialist, on 24 May 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:
And as I said before. This is an anime convention. A lot of people aren't understanding the word 'anime', nor are you understanding my point that we don't need to have two raves. Two raves are excessive for a con whose upper level management has all the planning ability of a toddler. When they are better able to plan for two raves, or get sufficient space to have 2 nights, then go for it, but never should something that is a staple of an anime con - no matter where you go - be shafted for just another dance.
I understand your point quite clearly. However, your point is merely a personal opinion. Your
opinion is that we don't need two raves. My point is that your
opinion is irrelevant, because Soap Bubble is not going to be canceled. That's a fact, jack. It brings in too many guests and too much revenue for the convention. And the Masquerade didn't get shafted for "just another dance." It got shafted because it had already started more than two hours late, and then a jerk whipped out a fire extinguisher, so the higher-ups had to make a tough decision. You don't like their decision? That's fine. You're entitled to your opinion. But don't blame the Soap Bubble. The Masquerade and the Soap Bubble are not mutually exclusive.
antisocialist, on 24 May 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:
Soap Bubble was the original rave. At one point, it may have been FOR anime fans, but it's ultimately a source of revenue to the expense of other events that anime fans particularly enjoy and make more of an effort for, and there are also a lot of people that are NOT anime fans and detest anime fans that are showing up to the raves. It's to the point where Acen cannot have both a masquerade and a rave. Get rid of the Saturday night rave and move it to Friday, you'll still have people coming out. Get rid of the Masquerade, you'll likely have people going over to Gencon or other cons, and Acen will lose out on money.
I know that Soap Bubble was the original rave. Your claims that Soap Bubble is "ultimately a source of revenue to the expense of other events that anime fans particularly enjoy and make more of an effort for," and that "it's to the point where ACen cannot have both a masquerade and a rave," are both ridiculous. Soap Bubble does not exist at the expense of the Masquerade or any other event at ACen (this year obviously notwithstanding). I'll say it for a third time: the Masquerade & the Soap Bubble are not mutually exclusive. We can have both of them. We always have, before this year. Anime fans enjoy the Soap Bubble. It was created
by them,
for them, at
their convention. What are you not understanding about this?
antisocialist, on 24 May 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:
Something you don't understand regarding lawsuits - lawyers cost money. They can demand huge returns. Someone could have a decent family lawyer, pay them a fair amount of money, and possibly win their case. Either way it goes, lawyers fees/court costs still can affect the convention. Also, considering the woeful lack of security presence and lack of effectiveness with the IRTs, it's only a matter of time before something to this effect happens, if it hasn't already. See - various women who were groped in front of IRTs and the IRTs did nothing.
I understand that lawyers cost money, but thank you for that enlightening heads-up. Also, thank you for presuming that I am such a blithering idiot as to be unaware that retaining the services of a litigator requires fiscal compensation. I will definitely keep that in mind in the future, when I sue Dominick's Grocery Store because a man assaulted me in their parking lot. I am certain that my lawsuit will prove to be fruitful, since my family has an expensive attorney on permanent retainer, and expensive attorneys who demand huge returns always win their cases, even when said cases don't have a legal leg to stand on. EVERYONE KNOWS THIS, IT IS A FACT.
Your point is that ACen should be concerned with the cost of retaining a lawyer (or lawyers) to combat any lawsuit stemming from criminal conduct at the Soap Bubble, because even if the lawsuit ends up being dismissed, ACen & MAPS will still have to pay their lawyer(s) for the job-well-done, yes? But what if someone onstage at the Masquerade were to be groped by a fellow skit-member who decided that ad-libbing a bit of physical comedy (in the groper's mind it is "physical comedy;" in the grope-ee's mind, it is sexual assault) would help their skit shine? The audience laughs (or maybe they "boo," it's irrelevant) but afterwards, the victim decides to sue ACen & MAPS because they didn't do anything to prevent the situation! Should ACen & MAPS be so wary of such a situation (that hasn't yet arisen in real life) that they cancel the Masquerade? I think not. Obviously, someone could sue ACen for a whole host of reasons. But every organization in the United States is, conceivably, at risk of suffering frivolous lawsuits. This does not mean that ACen should cancel the Soap Bubble.
antisocialist, on 24 May 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:
I am extremely bitter about Masquerade getting shafted over a second rave. It's the principle of the matter - people planned their butt off for these things. Don't get me wrong - I'm even more pissed about the fire alarm and the response of Acen management, but really, is it that surprising that someone would do something as drastic as trigger a fire alarm after Acen systems were DDoSed back in 2008? You plan for things like this.
Again, you should be "pissed" at the appropriate people/events/circumstances. Not at the Soap Bubble itself. That's called scapegoating.
antisocialist, on 24 May 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:
It wouldn't stop people from behaving badly - that's true. However, it wouldn't consist of an entire weekend of asinine behavior if you only have people showing up for one night (the first night) and then going home. Behaving badly is one thing, but the amount of crap that goes on at Acen is absolutely insane, and I lived in Atlanta around the time of Freaknik. Acen is getting close to that point, and that's scary. The rave should be 21+, all should be carded, and a cover of about $25 should be charged. That way, they can get their money from the rave without having the disingenuous numbers from people who pick up the one-day badge just for the rave.
I have no problem with carding for entry to Soap Bubble and/or Hardcore Synergy. I have no problem with an additional cover charge being applied to those who wish to attend these events. I have no problem with moving both dances to one night. These are constructive solutions. Canceling one or both dances is not a constructive solution.
I want to make it clear that I don't even particularly
enjoy Soap Bubble or Hardcore Synergy. But I also don't enjoy scapegoating, nor do I enjoy reading poorly-reasoned and illogical arguments. Canceling the Soap Bubble is not a "magic bullet" that will solve all of ACen's problems. Canceling the Soap Bubble will not prevent con-goers from behaving like louts. Canceling the Soap Bubble will not ensure that the Masquerade is given its rightful place at the forefront of ACen's festivities. The Masquerade and the Soap Bubble are not mutually exclusive (the fourth time's the charm).