ngsilver, on Apr 11 2009, 02:21 PM, said:
From your image, dispite the jaggies, the non-interlaced version looks MUCH better then the interlaced version. I think the problem with the decimated version is just that the wrong frame order was chosen (which can cause that problem) or a badly encoded DVD which makes proper filtering of the source difficult.
As I mentioned in e-mail discourse with Doomimus this can be a very complicated subject due to the software or editing processes being used.
"Decimate" is a function for certain filters like Decomb in Avisynth and Doomimus most likely doesn't process footage using Avisynth.
De-interlacing is a destructive process. You will lose image data when doing it. There are many "smart" filters out there which can greatly reduce this quality hit by only de-interlacing parts that move in the video (this is where that banding comes into play which is present in the images Doomimus posted). If you are using Windows you can use this filter (
http://neuron2.net/smart/smart.html ) with VirtualDub. It may improve your results.
If you just rip the DVDs and do not process the footage in some way that footage will be interlaced. At some point you will have to de-interlace or when things move in the video you will see that banding on a computer. Some choose to do de-interlacing in post-production and edit interlaced (because they are not doing any digital effects that will cause issues or one of their later intended output formats is NTSC which is of course interlaced).
The only way to have 100% progressive footage with 0 image data loss is to IVTC the footage before you edit.
There is also another potential issue with interlaced footage which can cause issues for people both in progressive or interlaced final output formats and that is field order. If you get footage that has mixed field orders you have to get them so they are all de-interlaced to start or they all have the same field order before you edit.